Legislature(2001 - 2002)

03/22/2001 03:05 PM House HES

Audio Topic
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 19-CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT/SOC SEC. #                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR  DYSON  announced that  the  committee  would hear  CS  FOR                                                               
SENATE  BILL  NO. 19(HES),  "An  Act  relating to  federal  child                                                               
support  enforcement   requirements  regarding   social  security                                                               
number  information,   employer  reports  about   employees,  and                                                               
certain  kinds   of  automated   data  matching   with  financial                                                               
institutions; repealing  the termination date of  changes made by                                                               
ch. 87, SLA 1997, and ch.  132, SLA 1998, regarding child support                                                               
enforcement and  related programs; repealing  the nonseverability                                                               
provision  of  ch.  132,  SLA  1998;  repealing  uncodified  laws                                                               
relating  to  ch. 87,  SLA  1997,  and  ch.  132, SLA  1998;  and                                                               
providing for an effective date."                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Number 0667                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
BARBARA   MIKLOS,  Director,   Central   Office,  Child   Support                                                               
Enforcement  Division,  Department  of  Revenue,  came  forth  in                                                               
support of SB 19.   She said that this is a  very similar bill to                                                               
HB 41,  which was passed out  of the House Health,  Education and                                                               
Social  Services  Standing  Committee.     There  are  two  major                                                               
differences.   One is that SB  19 has a five-year  sunset instead                                                               
of a two-year sunset.  The  second difference is that it does not                                                               
have the  amendment allowing  for a child  support payment  to be                                                               
held over if there are too many payments in one month.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR DYSON asked if it would  bother her if those two amendments                                                               
were made.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MS. MIKLOS, referring  to the two-year sunset,  responded that in                                                               
those two  years there is going  to be a new  governor, and there                                                               
is a chance  that there won't be a child  support director, or if                                                               
there  is a  new  child  support director,  that  person may  not                                                               
understand these issues.  She  remarked that she would be happier                                                               
if it were a three-year sunset.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  COGHILL  remarked  that   there  will  be  a  new                                                               
governor,  which is  a  good reason  why this  should  be up  for                                                               
discussion.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Number 0829                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE COGHILL made a motion  to adopt the proposed House                                                               
committee substitute  (HCS) for CSSB 19,  Version P, 22-GS1002\P,                                                               
Lauterbach, 3/7/01, as the working draft.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  CISSNA  objected.    She said  she  believes  the                                                               
division  has  shown  a  great  deal of  effort  and  success  in                                                               
cleaning up  a lot of  problems that  had been present  early on.                                                               
She said  she has witnessed  clients of  hers get off  of welfare                                                               
and  change   their  lives  around  because   their  partners  in                                                               
parenthood finally  began to take  personal responsibility.   She                                                               
said she  thinks it is  a good idea  to review the  divisions and                                                               
departments to see if they are doing what they should be doing.                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR DYSON asked Representative Cissna  what she is objecting to                                                               
with the [adoption of Version P].                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  CISSNA responded  that her  objection was  to the                                                               
effective date.  She removed her objection.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Number 1224                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR  DYSON announced  that there  being  no further  objection,                                                               
[Version P] was before the committee.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Number 1256                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  CISSNA   made  a   motion  to   adopt  conceptual                                                               
Amendment 1, to change the effective  date on page 6, line 16, to                                                               
2006.                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE COGHILL objected.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
A  roll  call  vote  was taken.  Representatives  Cissna,  Joule,                                                               
Wilson,  and  Dyson voted  for  the  amendment.   Representatives                                                               
Kohring,  Coghill  and  Stevens  voted against  it.    Therefore,                                                               
Amendment 1 was adopted by a vote of 4-3.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Number 1353                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
DENNY WEATHERS testified via teleconference.  She stated:                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
     In 1998, Alaska State  Legislature and Governor Knowles                                                                    
     sold  my  rights,  among   other  people's  rights  and                                                                    
     freedom,  to  the   federal  government  under  duress.                                                                    
     Those  were the  very  words stated  on  HB 344,  which                                                                    
     passed in  1998.  During  the testimony this  year, and                                                                    
     the  prior year  it showed  that the  people of  Alaska                                                                    
     were opposed to  HB 344.  In fact, the  only people for                                                                    
     it  [were]  the  government employers,  two  government                                                                    
     employees, and  the legislature.   And they  forced the                                                                    
     use  of  a federal  social  security  number on  Alaska                                                                    
     documents.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
     Up  until  1998  the  social security  number  was  not                                                                    
     required.   Now  persons  renewing  licenses are  being                                                                    
     denied  without the  social security  [number].   There                                                                    
     were several  bills in Juneau,  as well  as Washington,                                                                    
     D.C.  -  HR  220,  Identity Theft  Protection  Act,  in                                                                    
     Washington, D.C. -  to halt the use  of social security                                                                    
     numbers  on  documents.   House  Bill  344 was  set  to                                                                    
     sunset  this summer,  ending many  of the  problems for                                                                    
     most  of  us refusing  to  use  or divulge  our  social                                                                    
     security  [numbers].   On  February  6, 2001,  Governor                                                                    
     Knowles passed  that a  requirement of  social security                                                                    
     numbers  be continued  so the  state could  collect the                                                                    
     blackmail money.   The Senate voted 14 to 4  to set out                                                                    
     the federal  government.   The will  of the  people was                                                                    
     ignored.  Instead  of America, Home of the  Free, I now                                                                    
     live  in Communist  Alaska, where  we  are required  to                                                                    
     (indisc.) paper to live or  to believe.  Oh, excuse me;                                                                    
     I forgot -  you need a federal number in  Alaska to die                                                                    
     now.  It is stated in Section 4 of your bill there.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
     Maybe the  people still  have a  chance, which  I doubt                                                                    
     now,  listening  to  you.    I  thought  the  House  of                                                                    
     Representatives was willing to  stand up to the federal                                                                    
     government.   But  I see  you are  willing to  take the                                                                    
     blackmail money, too. ... I  would ask that you vote no                                                                    
     on ... SB 19.  The  social security number is a federal                                                                    
     number and was not required  to be used in Alaska until                                                                    
     1998.   You could make  that effective date on  [SB] 19                                                                    
     and [HB] 41 immediate, because  also if you say, "We're                                                                    
     going  to  get rid  of  the  child support  for  social                                                                    
     security number,  but not until we  collected money and                                                                    
     used you people."   I and my husband  paid and arranged                                                                    
     for  our own  children, as  all parents  did and  their                                                                    
     parents.  Our  sons do not owe child  support; in fact,                                                                    
     I  think  the  majority  of Alaskans  don't  owe  child                                                                    
     support.  So, I say  please don't punish us for someone                                                                    
     else's child support.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Number 1520                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
ERIC WEATHERS testified via teleconference.  He stated that he                                                                  
is opposed to SB 19 because he believes it is only another way                                                                  
to require the use of social security numbers.  He said:                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
     I've been  denied a driver's license  for not providing                                                                    
     a social  security number.   And  I have  been arrested                                                                    
     for it  and put in  jail for eight  hours - I  just got                                                                    
     out  - all  because the  social scientists  want money,                                                                    
     supposedly  for  stopping  dead-beat dads.    I'm  just                                                                    
     wondering how  long I'll be  put in jail next  time I'm                                                                    
     stopped for driving,  or hunting, or fishing.   I think                                                                    
     your  time would  be much  better  spent disarming  the                                                                    
     people.   That way,  you guys could  all stay  home and                                                                    
     let the federal government  and social services run the                                                                    
     state.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Number 1580                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR DYSON  made a motion  to rescind the committee's  action in                                                               
adopting Amendment 1.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE CISSNA objected.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
A roll  call vote was  taken [again for conceptual  Amendment 1].                                                               
Representatives  Cissna,  Joule, and  Wilson  voted  in favor  of                                                               
Amendment  1.   Representatives  Stevens,  Kohring, Coghill,  and                                                               
Dyson voted against it.  Therefore,  Amendment 1 failed by a vote                                                               
of 3-4.                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Number 1710                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  JOULE made  a motion  to  move HCS  for CSSB  19,                                                               
version  22-GS1002\P,  Lauterbach,  3/7/01, from  committee  with                                                               
individual  recommendations  and  attached fiscal  note.    There                                                               
being  no  objection,  HCS  CSSB 19(HES)  moved  from  the  House                                                               
Health, Education and Social Services Standing Committee.                                                                       

Document Name Date/Time Subjects